Victoria Chinatown

Google

November 12, 2008

City knows who did it

Filed under: , , Canadian politics, Chinatown, News, Vancouver, election, politics — admin @ 5:30 am

The $100m loan scandal is just getting juicier everyday!

Global TV reports tonight that city staff’s investigation into how the document was leaked (see Vancouver Sun) has made major progress. Going through surveillance tapes and entry swipe card records, the investigators now have a main suspect … who is a councillor!

Global didn’t say who the councillor was but hinted that this councillor is highly possible to return to city council after the election. So it should be someone who has a good chance of being re-elected…

Hmmm…. that’s the best scandal in years in BC.



Related posts

November 9, 2008

The ghost is still haunting

Filed under: , , Canadian politics, Chinatown, News, politics — admin @ 7:34 am

At a time when Harper seems to be loosening up? Had these “grassroots” spoken up before the election, there would be no Tory government. This country has no appetite for Bush’s right wing movement.

Grassroots Tories urging PM to move to right
Demands at next weekend’s policy convention could challenge Harper’s effort to soften party’s image

Globe and Mail — Grassroots Conservatives are urging Prime Minister Stephen Harper to act on long-standing demands of the Canadian right, such as less government and more health-care privatization, as they head into the party’s second-ever policy convention next weekend in Winnipeg.

Resolutions from Conservatives across the country have been whittled down to a few dozen that will be up for debate on the convention floor.

The final list includes demands that, if adopted, could challenge Mr. Harper’s efforts to soften the party’s image among those who aren’t traditional Conservatives.

“I think people are becoming impatient and they want to see some action. They want to see this government deliver a real, small c, conservative agenda,” said Gerry Nicholls, a conservative commentator with the Democracy Institute.

Mr. Nicholls said he expects traditional conservatives will be more vocal in their demands now that the party has two consecutive victories under its belt. He predicted resistance to Mr. Harper’s view that conservative policies must be adopted slowly so as not to alienate Canadian voters.

That tension may surface at the convention over several issues, including extra legal penalties for individuals who commit violence against a pregnant woman. The item is up for debate in spite of the fact that Mr. Harper distanced himself from the idea just days before the last election. His move blunted criticism that the measure, advocated at the time through a Conservative private member’s bill, could criminalize abortion indirectly.

The last time Conservatives gathered to vote on policy in 2005, Mr. Harper was spotted backstage kicking a chair in frustration as his young party threatened to unravel. In the end, Tories emerged united with a platform that sidelined thorny issues such as abortion and capital punishment.

Don Plett, the president of the party’s national council, said he expects lots of lively debate but pointed out the majority of the resolutions simply update policy to reflect the government’s decisions.

“Much of what we have there [in resolutions are] things that we have campaigned on in the past and the Conservative government has in fact implemented,” said Mr. Plett, who helped merge the Progressive Conservatives and the Canadian Alliance in 2003.

Conservative Party spokesman Ryan Sparrow played down the potential impact of the convention resolutions on government decisions.

“They’re just like any other consultation you would have with any stakeholder group,” he said, confirming the government will not be bound by the Winnipeg decisions.

Neither Mr. Plett nor Mr. Sparrow would comment on specific resolutions.

Delegates from Calgary are proposing 10-year, renewable term limits for Supreme Court judges and a reaffirmation of Parliament’s power to ignore the court’s rulings through the notwithstanding clause of the Constitution.

The two resolutions relating to the Supreme Court fit with long-standing concerns expressed within the party over the power of the courts to change Canadian law.

The proposal to limit Supreme Court justices to renewable 10-year terms is among the few major new ideas to be discussed at next weekend’s convention.

But the debate over the Supreme Court will be largely symbolic, given that term limits can’t be imposed without changing the Constitution, said University of Alberta law Professor Joanna Harrington.

Liberal MP Marlene Jennings said the proposal would also politicize the judiciary, as they would be dependent on government for renewals.

“It would cast a pall over their independence,” she said.

Can you imagine if this country could still be named “Canada” if these agendas got put through?

Resolutions up for debate

  • Supreme Court judges Supreme Court of Canada judges should serve 10-year renewable terms.
  • Health care Provinces should be encouraged “to further experiment with different means of delivering universal health care utilizing both the public and private health sectors.”
  • Auto emissions Canada should match California’s more stringent standards.
  • Military parents If they die while serving Canada, their children should be given free tuition to postsecondary institutions.
  • Human Rights Commission The Canadian commission’s authority to investigate complaints related to hate messages should be removed.
  • Streamlining The government should “streamline government services and eliminate waste, unnecessary overlap and duplication between the levels of government.”
  • Free votes Replace current party policy that all votes, other than the budget and main estimates, are free votes, with the policy that a Conservative government will make “most votes free.”


Related posts

November 8, 2008

Good news: Harper turns conciliatory

Filed under: , , Canadian politics, Chinatown, News, Stephane Dion, Stephen Harper, politics — admin @ 2:47 am

The Harper government is finally toning down its antagonism towards their political enemies. I love that. In fact, if Harper et al are serious about long term governance, all of them should learn to be tolerant with dissenters. I wish that the Chinese politicians could also learn to pick up that manner. I’m already seeing Alice Wong showing a more moderate attitude lately. After all, this is OUR country, right? I just love cooperation between different people. Maybe that’s because I’m a Libra. :)

Harper seeks co-operation, not confrontation in Commons

CP - The Harper government is striking a conciliatory tone as it prepares for the opening of Parliament, emphasizing the need for co-operation on the economy and downplaying the potential for confrontation.

As part of the kinder, gentler tone, Prime Minister Stephen Harper had a “cordial and businesslike” meeting Friday with Liberal Leader Stephane Dion.

He plans to meet the two other opposition leaders in the coming days, consulting them on priorities for the new parliamentary session, which opens Nov. 18.

A senior government official says Harper intends to focus almost exclusively on the global economic crisis and measures to help Canada weather the storm.

The official suggests Harper isn’t eager to immediately push ahead with a series of tough-on-crime proposals, including stiffer sentences for young offenders and reduced use of conditional sentences.

All three opposition parties say they will oppose the measures, even at the risk of defeating the minority Conservative government.

“We are focused on the economy,” the official told reporters at a background briefing. “We are not seeking confrontation in areas that are secondary to the economic focus of this government.”

During last month’s election campaign, Harper declared that the crime measures would be matters of confidence, defeat of which would plunge the country into another election.

The official refused to say Friday whether that threat still holds. He said only that the government reserves the right to determine what matters are considered votes of confidence.

The official said Dion agreed with Harper that Parliament’s central focus must be the economy. The two further agreed that the government should speed up infrastructure investments, refuse to raise business taxes and review expenditures to find billions in savings.

“I think it bodes well for the return of the House that this initial meeting was cordial.”



Related posts

November 2, 2008

Canadians like McKenna, Manley, Ignatieff but not Rae

Filed under: , , Canadian politics, Chinatown, News, politics, poll — admin @ 6:22 am

Angus Reid release – As Liberal Party supporters begin the process of choosing a replacement for Stéphane Dion, a political figure who has already announced he would not seek the party’s leadership is regarded in high esteem by both Canadians and Grit supporters, a new Toronto Star / Angus Reid poll has found.

In the online survey of a representative national sample of 1,006 adults, 34% of respondents express a favourable opinion of former New Brunswick premier Frank McKenna, while 22% hold unfavourable views. McKenna has a favourability score of +12—the best rating of 13 Liberal figures included in the poll.

Canadians are evenly divided in their assessment of former deputy prime minister and finance minister John Manley (30% favourable, 30% unfavourable). Current deputy leader Michael Ignatieff has a momentum score of -4, followed by former Ontario education minister Gerard Kennedy at -5, and Willowdale MP Martha Hall Findlay at -7.

What Canadians think

Next on the list of Liberal figures is Beauséjour MP Dominique Le Blanc with -10, followed by former public works and government services minister Scott Brison and Ottawa South MP David McGuinty both with -13. Former Ontario premier Bob Rae, former immigration minister Denis Coderre, and former prime minister Paul Martin are all at -14. Former prime minister Jean Chrétien and outgoing leader Dion hold the lowest favourability ratings among Canadians (-22 and -39 respectively).

A majority of Canadians are undecided when asked their opinion about Kennedy, Hall Findlay, LeBlanc, McGuinty, Brison and Coderre.

Among respondents who voted for the Liberal Party in the 2008 federal election, five men surpass the 50% mark in favourability. McKenna is once again the leader at +37, followed by Martin at +30, Ignatieff at +28, Dion at +26, Chrétien at +21, Manley at +18, and Rae at +17. At least 45% of Liberal voters are undecided in their assessment of Hall Findlay, McGuinty, Coderre, Kennedy, Brison, and LeBlanc.

What Liberal supporters think

When asked about key traits for the next Liberal Party leader, 60% consider it “very important” for whoever takes over after Dion to have experience as an economic manager, and 50% want a person who is fluent in both official languages.

Almost half of Canadians (49%) think it is “very important” for the next Liberal leader to have experience in international affairs. Other issues—such as charisma (37%), experience in the federal cabinet (32%) and experience in provincial politics (32%)—are not as significant.

Finally, Canadians were asked when they expect the Liberals to form the Canadian government again. Almost three-in-ten (28%) believe a Grit administration will come after the next federal election, one-in-four (24%) believe it will take two federal ballots for the Liberals to return to power, and 18% believe the feat will require three or more federal elections.



Related posts

November 1, 2008

[GB] Why drag SUCCESS into politics?

Filed under: , , Canadian politics, Chinatown, Chinese Canadian, Guest Blogger, politics — admin @ 1:08 am

Guest blogger: Gabriel Yiu
To clearly stand out a guest blogger entry, all such headlines will begin with [GB].
Tung Chan, the CEO of SUCCESS, recently criticized NDP Leader Carole James’ economic plan on the Chinese radio. When the leader of the Chinese community’s prominent organization publicly condemned James, I must say I was puzzled. As an advisor to the BC Opposition, should I take the criticisms as an official statement of the organization, and report to the leader and suggest that she responds to the criticisms, if only as a matter of courtesy towards SUCCESS and the Chinese community?

Are Chan’s comments personal? Or are they a reflection of the position of SUCCESS? Although I would presume the former, would the Chinese public perceive the difference? (I presume Mr. Chan wouldn’t make the same political comments through the English media, or would he?) When the members of SUCCESS and the Chinese residents see Chan participating in community events and on the media, they see him as the chief of SUCCESS, so how can they differentiate the two roles when he is commenting on politics in his own capacity? When Chan was appointed to the position of CEO of SUCCESS, he vowed he would put aside his partisan politics.

Tung Chan is of course a former NPA Vancouver city councilor. He served alongside the then mayor, Gordon Campbell, and has been a very keen supporter of Campbell and his BC Liberal Party. Chan was also a key member of Brian Mulroney’s Progressive Conservative Party. Before working for SUCCESS, he was the vice-president of a major bank.

Throughout the years, I’ve debated with Chan many times on the Chinese media and his partisanship really impressed me. For example, during the era when the Reform/Canadian Alliance was the Official Opposition and the Progressive Conservative was near extinction, Chan could still say firmly on the media that his party would win the election. I can recall we once debated the problem of block vote in political party nominations. In order to cast a favorable light on his party, Chan said MP Chuck Cadman lost his party nomination because he was a lousy MP. The election result showed the contrary: Cadman was elected as an independent.

Since nearly 70% of SUCCESS’ revenue comes from the government, should its CEO be making political commentaries through the media? We certainly haven’t seen the administrators of other organizations like the Cancer Agency or advanced education institutions commenting on politics publicly, unless there were matters related to their institution, field or constituency, especially during highly sensitive election or by-election time.

On the Chinese radio, Chan criticized Carole James’ position to abolish the carbon tax. He opposed the NDP leader’s stand to increase the minimum wage. He agreed with the government’s refusal to help the forest industry. Chan also criticized the NDP’s governing record and praised the Liberals for their achievements in the past few years.

It’s well-known that Campbell’s carbon tax is highly unpopular. When you tune to the Chinese radio, you can hear commentators and open-line callers all slamming this unfair and ineffective tax. What James has done is listen to public opinion, promise to cancel the carbon tax but keep the Liberal tax cut. But she was criticized publicly by the leader of the largest Chinese community organization. Does SUCCESS have a position on supporting the carbon tax? If yes, when and where does this position come from? Is it a resolution of the board of directors or of its members?

Since the Liberal Party got into power in 2001, the government hasn’t raised the minimum wage; at the same time government fees and living costs have gone up rapidly. Campbell even introduced a $6 working wage…. We all know that most of the minimum-wage workers are immigrant, women and ethnic minorities, many of them Chinese. SUCCESS is obviously an organization serving immigrant and ethnic communities, so why would its leader not fight for the welfare of immigrants, but side with the authorities against its constituents?

In the past two years, BC’s biggest industry, forestry, has been in a historic crisis: numerous mills closed, close to 20,000 workers lost their jobs, their families were in a dire situation and local economies were devastated. Chan supported the Liberal government’s refusal to assist. Does forestry relate to SUCCESS’ operation? If the government wouldn’t help an industry in difficulty, why did it spend huge amounts of taxpayers’ money to subsidize the oil and banking industries which have been making record profits? The Liberal government subsidized the oil and gas industry to the tune of $685 million in this year and the next, while the big banks got a tax cut of $220 million. On the contrary, the forestry industry and the small businesses that were seriously affected by the construction of Canada Line got no assistance from the BC government.

Mulroney’s corrupt Progress Conservative Party was badly defeated in 1993 but the Conservative Party led by Stephen Harper was elected in 2006. When the leader of a political party made some serious mistakes, does it mean that that party is not qualified to govern again? If that were the case, only the Bloc, the NDP and the Green could govern federally.

Today, any knowledgeable person would realize that Canada’s good economy in the past few years was attributable to the high international commodity prices and the real estate boom resulting from the US government’s low interest rate, set after the bursting of the high tech bubble in 2001. It had indeed very little to do with the policy of the provincial government; otherwise, Gordon Campbell could also have claimed credit for the huge surge of the Canadian dollar.

Likewise, BC’s slow economic development in the 90s was very much affected by external factors. BC’s second largest exporting country, Japan, was in a long and painful recession then. The low international commodity prices and the 1997 Asian Financial Storm — these were influences that the BC and federal governments were powerless to change.

If the blame of external factors has to be borne by the governing party, then with the Wall Street financial tsunami knocking down our real estate market and economy in sight, shouldn’t the BC Liberal Party and the federal Conservative Party both take the blame?

Finally, regarding achievement, the writer would like to remind Chan that the office that you’re working in, the entire tower of the SUCCESS headquarters, plus the neighboring SUCCESS senior care centre, were funded by the NDP government (plus the museum archive of the Chinese Cultural Centre, the Millennium Gate, the Chinatown parkade and the CBA’s affordable housing manor etc.). Gordon Campbell has governed for almost eight years, what has he built for the Chinese community?

—————————————

Disclaimer: Views expressed by guest bloggers are theirs and may not represent those of CIV.



Related posts

October 28, 2008

American election jargons

Filed under: , , Chinatown, USA, politics — admin @ 8:20 am

With the US election coming in less than a week, blogger The View from Seymour has compiled a “Canadian Guide to American Political English.”

I found it both useful and funny, for example:

Diva: From the Latin for “goddess”; female singer with a whim of steel; Sarah Palin.

Have fun. :lol:



Related posts

October 11, 2008

Cadman’s tape not doctored: court record

Filed under: , , Canadian politics, Chinatown, David Cadman, News, Stephen Harper, politics — admin @ 1:05 am

It’d be interesting if, and how, Harper would respond to this. hmmm…

CP - A tape recording at the centre of Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s $3.5-million defamation suit against the Liberal party was not altered as the prime minister has claimed, a court-ordered analysis of the tape by Harper’s own audio expert has found.

The key portion of the recorded interview of Harper by a B.C. journalist contains no splices, edits or alterations, says the finding by a U.S. forensic audio expert.

The analysis was filed in Ontario Superior Court on Friday by lawyers for the Liberal party, despite attempts by Harper’s lawyer to keep the opinion out of the court file until at least next week.

Harper sued the Liberals in the midst of a raging controversy earlier this year over claims in a book by B.C. author Tom Zytaruk that Conservatives offered late MP Chuck Cadman a $1-million life insurance policy in return for help defeating the minority Liberal government in 2005.

The prime minister claims Zytaruk doctored the tape of an interview he conducted with Harper after Cadman died, and denies he told Zytaruk he was unaware of the “details” of the insurance policy offer.

Harper insists he only confirmed the party had offered Cadman “financial considerations” in return for rejoining the Tories and voting against the Liberals in a Commons confidence vote.

But former FBI agent Bruce Koenig, the sound expert Harper hired to prove his allegations, submitted a report dated Friday to Harper’s lawyer, which also had to be sent to the Liberal lawyer, Chris Paliare, saying the contentious portion of the interview was uninterrupted.

Koenig said the first part of Zytaruk’s interview with Harper, where the two had apparently discussed other aspects of Harper’s relationship with Cadman, had been erased and over-recorded with the portion dealing with the insurance policy.

But that segment had not been altered, Koenig found.

He reported that it “contains neither physical nor electronic splices, edits or alterations, except for the over-recording start that erased and replaced the end of the first part of the designated interview.”



Related posts

October 7, 2008

Metro Vancouver riding predictions as of Oct 5

Filed under: , , Chinatown, Election 2008, election, politics, poll — admin @ 8:12 pm

Here are the predictions of outcomes for hotly contested BC ridings as of Oct 5. Data are collected from the Election Prediction Project and Vote for Environment project, each claims to base their predictions on all available latest poll results.

RIDING VFG PROJECTIONS EPJ PROJECTIONS

Buranby-

Douglas

NDP - 18285
Liberal - 12641
Conservative - 11676
Green - 6445
NDP

Burnaby-

New Westminster

NDP - 18277
Conservative - 10715
Liberal - 10256
Green - 6027
NDP
Richmond Liberal - 15628
Conservative - 15297
NDP - 6969
Green - 6229
Conservative
Surrey North NDP - 17012
Conservative - 8551
Liberal - 4472
Green - 4442
Other - 1207
Too close
Vancouver Centre Liberal - 20982
NDP - 17503
Conservative - 9584
Green - 8911
Other - 122
Liberal
Vancouver East NDP - 24763
Liberal - 6921
Green - 6692
Conservative - 4075
NDP
Vancouver Kingsway NDP - 17223
Liberal - 15963
Conservative - 6981
Green - 5811
Other - 188
NDP
Vancouver South Liberal - 17907
Conservative - 10249
NDP - 10068
Green - 5697
Liberal

Vancouver

Quadra

Conservative - 8968
Liberal - 8860
Green - 6678
NDP - 3789
Too close

West Vancouver-

Sunshine Coast-

Sea to Sky Country

Conservative - 20551
Liberal - 20510
Green - 11564
NDP - 10938
Conservative



Related posts

Amanda Zhao’s parents arrive in Canada

Filed under: , , Amanda Zhao, Canada-China relation, Chinatown, News, justice, politics — admin @ 3:07 pm

Amanda Zhao's parents and cousin finally arrived in Vancouver. Jenny Kwan greeted them at the airport on Oct 6, 2008. (Ming Pao photo)

———————–

They are finally here in Vancouver.

They are Yang Baoying, Zhao Zisheng and Li Junjun. They are the family of murdered Chinese student Amanda Zhao. They arrived at YVR yesterday after flying 20 hours Beijing-Hong Kong-Vancouver. The tickets were sponsored by CARE Society. Their visa application fees were sponsored by MLAs Jenny Kwan and Mike Farnworth. The Tzu Chi Foundation offered $2000.

“After so many years, I can finally speak up,” an emotional Yang said with her lips trembling.

Oct 9 marks the 6th anniversary of the murder. Kwan has organized a memorial for Amanda on Thursday in Chinese Cultural Centre.

Foreign affairs minister David Emerson will be meeting Yang on Thursday. They will also meet with representatives of the RCMP, with the arrangement by Kwan.

Amanda Zhao, a 21 year old Chinese national student as reported missing on October 9, 2002 after she did not return from a trip to a convenience store. Her murdered body was found by hikers on October 20,2002 near Stave Lake north of Mission. After Zhao’s body was found, Ang Li, her boy friend at the time was questioned by police. Ang Li was a Chinese national and computer science student at Simon Fraser University. A break in the case came after police interviewed Ang Li’s cousin, 19 year old Han Zhang who implicated Ang Li in the murder. Han Zhang was later charged with being an accessory after the fact in Amanda’s murder. Seven months after Zhao’s body was found, the RCMP issued a warrant for Ang Li, long after he had gone to China. It was further reported that Ang Li was taken into custody in China in early 2004 but released shortly after by Chinese authorities for lack of evidence.

———————————

There’re a few notes I’d like to say about the story behind bringing Yang and her family to Vancouver.

In May 2007, Ming Pao received a letter written by Yang Baoying and Li Junjun asking the Canadian department of justice to talk to them and tell them what the progress is about bringing justice to their only daughter. They wished we could relay the message for them.

At the same time, Yang already told us that she wanted to come to Canada and speak to someone herself. Our reporters, who have never given up this story ever since it happened, phoned politicians around to see if any one would like to help in any way. We also phoned several charity and community organizations, asking if someone would  be willing to sponsor Yang’s trip, as we know the family was in very difficult financial hardships as their home was demolished by the government to make way for the Beijing Olympic. Yang and her husband have to live from relatives’ homes to homes. They didn’t even know when they would stay the next week.

For politicians, we started with Bill Siksay, as he was the MP for the riding in which Amanda was killed. Also, Siksay’s former boss Svend Robinson had been very outspoken for the case. We also contacted Libby Davis and Raymond Chan. Surprisingly, the only MP who didn’t mind meeting with Yang or help her write letters to Ottawa was Raymond Chan. But Chan already said he couldn’t pay for Yang’s tickets or whatever, he could only meet with them. No one else — including so-called community leaders — were willing to pick up the tab.

We of course talked to DOJ as we did once in a while to check on the progress of the case. As usual, we were told nothing could be disclosed because of privacy issue. We called foreign affairs to see if they could arrange a meeting. Nope. We phoned the RCMP, any new progress? Nope. We also talked to China’s public safety ministry. A staffer told us that China was extremely committed to bringing the suspected killer to justice but needed the cooperation from Canada.

After a month of unsuccessful phoning around, we published Yang’s letter in June. And I published an English version here in CIV.

In October, on the eve of the 5th anniversary of Amanda Zhao’s murder, one of our reporters flew to Beijing and talk to Yang Baoying and Li Junjun.

In November, MPs Bill Siksay and Libby Davis spoke up for the Zhao’s in the parliament, asking Ottawa to work harder on the case. A DOJ spokesperson agreed that he would relay Yang’s wish to meet with the minister for us. Later, public safety minister Stockwell Day passed the ball to BC’s solicitor general John Les. The Province wrote an editorial urging to bring closure to the Zhao family. MLA Jenney Kwan finally picked up the story and made an appeal in BC legislature, reading out Yang’s letter. John Les replied it’s a federal matter.

Kwan followed up with a press conference with MLA Mike Farnworth.

In December, PM’s right hand man Jason Kenney had an editorial meeting with Ming Pao. We raised the Amanda story with him. He only had a very faint idea about who Amanda Zhao was. We explained the story to him and he expressed interest. He took out a pen and jotted down notes, saying “interesting.” He agreed to follow up on the case.

Days after, we emailed Kenney’s communication director and was told they were already gathering all the old press stories for Kenney. We were told Kenney had a plan to speak with public safety minister Stockwell Day and justice minister Rob Nicholson in the new year.

Also in December, Jenny Kwan wrote a letter to the deputy commissioner of the RMCP demanding actions on the case.

In Janurary 2008, with a little help from us, Yang Baoying submitted a formal, English request to Nicholson for a meeting in person. Jenny Kwan agreed to invite Yang should the feds not. Bill Siksay and Libby Davis promised to look for ticket and accomodation sponsors.

In March, Kenney’s office told us that Harper’s cabinet has discussed about Amanda Zhao’s case and there’s a “political consensus” that Ottawa would faciliate to bring the killer to justice.

Meanwhile, Kwan and Farnworth began to work on inviting Yang over. They issued a formal invitation so that Yang’s visas could be processed in Beijing. Kwan and Farnworth even paid for their visa application fees after learning the Zhao’s couldn’t even make a payment themselves. Kwan was saying to us that she hoped Yang could come before her baby was born, with a due date in late August.

In early September, Yang told us they got the visas. Jason Kenney said he was prepared to meet with them and could arrange them to meet with other high level officials, David Emerson among them. Kwan and Farnwoth held a press conference to announce the trip.

Then there was a little public disagreement between Kwan et al and Kenney et al here. Both claimed to be the person who did the work for Yang’s trip and meetings. Kenney said Kwan was making political capitalization out of the case because as a provincial representative, she wouldn’t have access to arrange for high level official meetings for the Zhao’s. Kwan et al blasted Kenney for claiming Kwan’s hardwork as his.

To us, though, we only want to help Yang to realize her wish. It really doesn’t matter who did the ground work. It’s Deng Xiaoping’s famous line: “No matter it’s a black or white cat, it’s a good cat as long as it catches mice.”

Read more:



Related posts

September 26, 2008

Are we in a democracy Part II

Filed under: , , Canadian politics, Chinatown, Press freedom, politics — admin @ 7:41 am

I was hinted by some “insiders” today that the Tories are outraged over our story about the drop of Chinese and Indian immigrants since 2006.

One Chinese candidate doesn’t even hide his hatred towards us in front of his supporters. Some are trying to “complain” to my boss saying we are “stirring up issues” during this sensitive election time.

Well, if all these comments were true, then I’m really shocked by the shallowness of our politicians. First of all, Canada is a democracy. We are (supposedly) enjoying freedom of speech and the press. Politicians are (supposed) to be monitored and checked by the press and the public 24 hours, 365 days. They must have forgotten they run for office to SERVE, not to DICTATE. It’s us the taxpayers giving them the mandate to govern and paying them monthly cheques.

If you don’t want bad press, then don’t act badly. Be fair to everybody. Politicians should not blame the media for the bad policies they put in place. They should never base their public support on trying to hide the facts.

I know many Chinese politicians think they are gods (tUCC, are you there??), seeing the media as their enemies and believing Chinese media bosses can be influenced and manipulated. Well, I assure you won’t get that from us.

Secondly, we have been chasing the immigration figures since summer began. It was the government who did not want to respond to us. It wasn’t until we got a hold of immigration “quota” figures that they knew they had to provide us with the data in a timely manner. If we held off the figures — aka not “stirring up issues” — until after the election, what kind of journalism would that be? What kind of political accountability is that?

Besides, we have been using neutral words in the immigration figure story such as “the federal government”, “CIC” etc. We weren’t pointing our fingers towards any particular party. In fact, we were criticized by some strong-opined readers that we were too “soft” on the Conservatives in that story. The only time we mentioned the Conservatives in our article was to state the fact: that “the Tories knocked down the Liberals after 13 years of governance and formed a minority government in 2006″. How other people/parties/politicians used the story AFTER it’s published to blast the Tories is beyond our reach. Besides, we have waited long enough for a response that seems would never come to us.

I’ve heard that some party insiders described me as “insanely anti-Conservative”. They probably didn’t know I almost brought Raymond Chan to his knees back in 2003 when we, partnered with the Vancouver Sun, exposed the scandal of him buying membership.

To political parties: We are living in a democracy. We are no “People’s Daily”. We have no duty to say only good words about you.

To all Chinese politicians: Be real. Be mature. Be a Canadian. Don’t bully the media. It’s useless.

Related posts

Newer Posts »